Rack Pack Blog
All the latest news and information from iomart Hosting
Will Cloud Computing add value to the marketing mix?
Posted by Rack Packer - 07/09/10 at 09:09:52 amThe Advertising Industry is cutting through the hype and beginning to realise the Cloud’s potential
For the past 18 months the hype has suggested that Cloud Computing will be the next game changer. But will it? Or are we simply witnessing the next major land grab by a few technology giants on a perceived new market segment?
A plethora of recent surveys has shown that whilst organisations are generally aware of the cloud, they are reticent to dive in and procure services. For every survey that suggests that a CIO is considering Cloud Computing as a priority for his or her organisation you will find another survey stating that business leaders haven’t a clue as to its meaning or how it will aid them.
With over 20 different definitions of cloud computing in play, it’s hardly surprising that the market is suffering from a ‘fog’ of confusion. Several reasons are given, which include hype over substance, internal resistance and security concerns - all of which suggest that the industry spin doctors need to work harder to get the cloud benefit message across.
The industry needs to focus less on the technology and more on the needs of the customer. We need much less of the ‘Infrastructure as a Service’ type jargon and more of the ‘Business as a Service’ approach. Cloud is about evolution of services not revolution.
The core attraction of cloud is that companies can avoid buying and running their own hardware, software and other equipment by contracting with a hosting vendor to supply the systems on its own servers. This outsourcing of computing resources offers flexibility, scalability, agility and costs savings over the traditional in house approach. Four attributes which should, and is, making cloud a prime candidate for early adoption by campaign and project managers.
Campaigns and one off events are notoriously dynamic and really benefit from the ‘on demand’ nature or elasticity that the cloud offers. In theory the cloud should rid us of server crashes as we clamour for the hottest tickets and news, with spikey demand being controlled and managed.
StreetSmart, which asks diners in the nation’s top restaurants to give an extra £1 on top of their bill during the festive period, was one of the first UK Charities to have its website fully hosted and managed on a cloud platform.
Glenn Pougnet, Director of StreetSmart, said: “The cloud has presented us with the perfect solution for handling the short term increase in demand that we face with our annual StreetSmart Christmas campaign. The cloud has removed the worry for us of having to manage our website capacity ensuring that our site is always available to potential donors and restaurant patrons. We are left free to concentrate on running the campaign and raising vital funds to give homeless people hope and a new start in life.”
Think Publishing, the communications agency behind Kate Humble’s charitable web site Stuffyourrucksack.com has also turned to the cloud to cope with seasonal visitor peaks. Think Publishing increases processing power during the summer months, when its campaigns are at their most active, targeting travellers embarking on their vacations, and more importantly only pays for the additional short term resources consumed.
Conversely, ineffective or unworkable projects can be reviewed and pulled without the additional burden of wasted hardware investment affecting the decision making process. Social media, viral campaigns and trending topics can all be maximised and exploited through the real time deployment of cloud servers, providing an agency with agility, thought leadership and competitive advantage.
New Media Age recently revealed that only 17 of the total 200 videos featured in their Viral Brand Chart appeared for a second week, meaning there’s only an 8.5% chance of being a top-ten viral for more than a week. The simple reason given for this is that impact of a viral video is simply diminished because of the volume of video content being uploaded to sites such as YouTube, which receives more than 24 hours of content every minute. Apparently we don’t want to share things once they’re past their sell by point because we don’t want to seem uncool. Gone are the days when we would have planned to support a viral campaign for several weeks and would have utilised servers accordingly. Now we need an infrastructure that can cope with high demand over a short time frame - the perfect attributes of the cloud.
Likewise if we are fortunate enough to have a campaign that attracts the support of an uber Tweeter such as Lady Gaga or a Taylor Swift and they happen to tweet about your brand/offer etc - you can expect a huge surge in traffic. In the old days you might have been able to contact the PR and asked for a timed ‘mention’ to assist with capacity planning but not today. That’s not how the net works. You simply need to be prepared and be able to increase capacity on the fly.
But cloud shouldn’t simply be viewed as a technology. It does generally have the ability to change organisational process for the better. One huge advantage of the cloud is that it offers designers the ability to test, create and share without their destiny being controlled by “corporate IT”. It is often thought that the IT department of the future will be staffed with orchestrators and strategists not simply technicians. The IT department will become drivers of innovation not merely suppliers.
With the right culture in place, the cloud has the ability to bring together the talents of the creative world allowing them to work collaboratively on projects that interest and excite them. This is already happening but as cloud based technology advances it will become even easier.
The US Media Group, Journal Register Company, demonstrated this concept back in July by running the intriguing experiment of involving community Crowdsourcing and the use of free online publishing tools for the production of all their publications. Journal Register produced all of its 18 daily websites and newspapers using only free web-based tools, such as the cloud based Google Docs, social media websites, Facebook and Twitter and the open-sourced software, Scribus.
At the time, Journal Register Company’s Chief Executive Officer, John Paton stated that whilst his company would not be converting to a fully integrated Crowd/Cloud model in the immediate future, he believes that the idea is a potentially viable one.
No one should claim that moving to the cloud suits everyone or that it is easy. Agencies will need to be convinced that service levels are real, tools are available to track and manage individual clients/campaigns, billing is transparent and that the vendor has the appropriate expertise and security processes in place to safeguard their business. Trust will be the single biggest factor in the success of the cloud.
But overall, the arguments for adopting the cloud are too compelling to ignore and it would appear that the media industry is beginning to cut through the cloud hyperbole and is starting to investigate how it can reinvent its IT architecture and processes into a much more flexible and efficient tool for business.
Say Hello, Wave Goodbye – why it will pay to turn to Green IT
Posted by Rack Packer - 06/08/10 at 11:08:34 amWaves have been making, well, waves this week.
Google announced that it will no longer being investing in further development of Wave, the much heralded collaborative working application which was eventually going to replace email. Whilst some commentators have been quick to point out that this does not mean that Google Wave is dead (the code is available as opensource), it certainly appears to have crashed against the rocks.
The company has also recently been in the news for another ‘natural element’ themed story. Google Energy recently announced an agreement to purchase 114 megawatts of wind power capacity per year for 20 years at a set price from an Iowa wind farm owned and operated by NextEra Energy Resources. Google spokesperson, Jamie Yood, stated: “This is the first contract for Google Energy. We plan on exploring other opportunities to provide our data centers with environmentally friendly power in 2010. It isn’t limited to wind power.”
Which links nicely to the other major wave story of the week, and one which centres on a 12 tonne mollusc shaped ‘socket’ that has been laid on the seabed off the north coast of Cornwall. The Wave Hub is a marine testing facility that is designed to connect wave power with the national grid. The Hub will consist of a cable distribution unit connected to arrays of wave energy devices floating on or just below the surface.
This project is seen as a vital element in the UK’s renewable energy programme. The UK has some of the largest wave and tidal energy resources in Europe. Allowing for technical, practical and environmental limitations, wave energy alone could potentially generate up to 15% of the UK’s electricity consumption. By 2020 the wave energy market in the UK could be worth £0.2 billion.
The UK Government is committed to increasing the amount of electricity generated by renewable energy sources to 10% by 2010 and 15% by 2015, with an aspiration to reach 20% by 2020. The hope is that renewables will help to address increasingly important energy and environmental issues surrounding the continued use of traditional and fossil fuels.
For the Hosting and Data Centre industries, the availability of readily available renewable energy is going to be vital to its long term viability.
The UK Government Energy Secretary Chris Huhne, caused widespread consternation this week, when in his first annual energy statement he indicated that UK energy bills by 2020 are expected to increase by one percent domestically, but might rise by as much as 43 percent for businesses, as national policies are implemented aimed at reducing carbon emissions.
The IT industry is responsible for around 2% of the world’s carbon emissions and data centers are the fastest growing part of that footprint. It’s estimated that the average data centre uses as much electricity as 4,000 homes annually, so the Industry could be set for some hefty increases in its fuel bills - increases which will inevitably be passed on to customers.
And it’s this cost that is now, rather unsurprisingly, focusing the minds of tech companies everywhere on how it can be contained and reduced. Renewables will play a major part in reducing environmental impact but operational efficiency will be vital in reducing actual energy consumption.
Pike Research in its recently issued report “Green Data Centers” claims that energy efficiency now has a “major emphasis” at IT firms, and that investment in data centres will increase from $7.5bn (£4.7bn) this year to $41.4bn (£26bn) in five years’ time. The report also suggests that green server farms will account for 28% of the entire market.
Pike Research analyst Eric Woods stated: “But as datacentre energy costs become more visible, the financial benefits of moving to a greener mode of operation are being recognised.”
And it’s not hard to see why the future is suddenly changing its hue from orange to green. Usage stats pulled from one of our data centres, combined with an average server utilisation of less than 10%, suggest that the average server is costs anywhere between £8 and £12 per month in energy costs for simply being plugged in, powered and cooled. If your IT estate runs to a couple of hundred servers, you could potentially be losing £26K per annum on wasted power costs. Become more operationally efficient and reduce your servers by 50% and you add £13K straight to the bottom line.
One long standing criticism of the industry has been that it has only really focused on the low hanging fruits, that it has paid no more than lip service to changing its operational methods, but perhaps we will now see a ‘sea change’ in the way we tackle the issues. Advances in technology such as unified communications, virtualisation and cloud computing coupled with the availability of renewable energy sources present the industry with many of the ingredients required to genuinely reduce costs.
If organisations won’t adopt a more environmentally-friendly attitude themselves, seeing the ‘all things green’ as the preserve of the eco warrior and the tree hugger, then perhaps the threat of a near 50% increase in power costs will grab their attention.
Oil’s well for Green IT or are we chasing a broken pipe dream?
Posted by Rack Packer - 16/06/10 at 03:06:29 pmGreen issues and spills have been dominating the headlines this week (and surprisingly not all of them refer to the performance of a certain English goalkeeper). From the Gulf of Mexico Oil disaster and ensuing diplomatic fall out, to the news that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has launched its Energy Star program for data centers and an analysis of the economic impact of the American Power Act (APA), released by Senators Kerry and Lieberman mid-May.
It is no surprise that much of the coverage of this week has focused on the need to move away from our dependence on fossil fuels- to break our oil addiction - to ‘cleaner’ renewable energy sources and the need for us to use the energy that we consume more efficiently and effectively.
President Obama in his first Oval Office address appeared to use the public outrage over the Gulf’s oil crisis to leverage momentum for his personal goal of a greener energy future. He laid out his plans to deal with BP and then exhorted his countrymen to embark on a mission to reduce their reliance on fossil fuel. A task which may not be as farfetched as it appears on the surface, if the results of the EPA study are to be believed.
The EPA analysis concluded that the APA is not only affordable, but a worthy investment. For a relatively modest sum, between 22 to 40 cents per day through 2050, American households would be able to fund the creation of clean energy jobs, a reduction in the dependence on oil and protection of the planet, and polls suggest that this might be palatable to US residents. And apparently it’s not just householders that are showing broad support for the need to act on climate change.
A survey undertaken amongst the SME community by the Small Business Majority, a research, education and advocacy organization, showed that 61 percent of small businesses surveyed, agree that a move to clean energy can restart the economy and help small businesses create jobs, and that half of the small businesses support clean energy and climate legislation.
Which is all fine and dandy, voicing our support (or lack of it) for a greener world in a telephone interview is a lot easier than actually doing something tangible. And herein lies the problem – what exactly can we do or what should we be doing and how will we benefit? If we are serious about changing the way we currently operate, then we need to break the mould, challenge and change our entrenched business practises and actually stop talking the talk and start walking the walk.
As a huge guzzler of energy, the IT industry often finds itself an easy Green target, hence the introduction of the EPAs Energy Star scheme. In the US, for example, data centres consumed less than 1% of total US electricity use in 2000, but that will rise to at least 2.3% of all electricity used nationwide this year, according to the Uptime Institute. Figures in other parts of the world are comparable.
IT departments therefore share a huge task to implement the changes that will reverse this trend. When you broach this topic with companies, most IT professionals and executives will state that they are genuinely concerned about their IT departments’ impact on the environment – or are at least interested in the economic benefits of being more energy efficient.
Yet in a BPM Forum survey, while 86% of respondents said IT organisations have a “responsibility to substantially improve efficiency and green activities”, only 41% had any specific green plans in place. “The biggest overarching message,” Derek Kober, director BPM Forum stated, “was that, despite concern and despite increasing priorities for improving the environment and greening the data centre, IT departments in general are pretty far behind.”
This is a view shared by Forrester Research analyst James Staten who stated in the current edition of Green IT Magazine that “IT administrators define green from the hard currency perspective, rather than something that is environmental. They don’t really make a lot of decisions around what’s environmentally responsible or not.” In its last quarterly review, ‘Green progress in enterprise IT’, research conducted by Forrester showed that 38% of enterprises now include respect for the environment among their evaluation criteria and 55% of them put cost reduction at the top of their list of priorities.
At the same time, while green IT has become a very topical subject, it seems there are a range of views about what constitutes ‘green IT. On the one hand, there is the argument that it is primarily a bottom-line focused activity that also helps save the planet. On the other hand, there is the view that almost every new initiative nowadays has been ‘green washed’ and that not nearly enough is being done to actually improve our planet’s condition.
Separating green facts from green fiction often results in inaction. With so much green spin and misinformation out there, it’s little wonder that many organisations have become sceptical of green technology, not because of any indifference to the plight of the environment, but because they are not at all sure who to trust. Which green products and solutions really are green? And, even if you are sure of the authenticity of the environmental claims being made by certain vendors on behalf of their own particular offerings, how sure can you be that they are operating within a green supply chain?
“Green IT has to be about more than presenting a nice picture to the market or senior management,” stated research outfit Redemtech president Robert Houghton. “It has to be sustainable, both environmentally and financially. That requires applying the same processes and discipline to these programmes as are used in other areas of the business.”
One thing we do not need is more rhetoric. According to research by the Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment at Oxford University oil demand is now outstripping supply and we need to invest quickly in alternative energy sources. Kuwaiti Scientists have recently released a report which found that worldwide conventional crude oil production will peak in 2014, years earlier than anticipated and that the world’s oil reserves are being depleted at a rate of 2.1 percent a year. A fact not lost on Bill Gates who called this week for the US Government to invest billions of dollars a year in R&D bring about a clean energy revolution. With 80 percent of today’s primary energy demand coming from fossil fuels, we need to start taking action now.
In an odd way, the environmental disaster occurring in the Gulf might be the very catalyst that the world needs to wake up and start addressing the very real issues that we face. Even if you do not believe that climate change is a direct result of man’s actions, or that climate change even exists, they’re can be no denying that fossil fuels are a finite resource, and if we are to avoid the situation where we simply can’t power the information super highway, we need to take ‘Green IT’, in all its forms, seriously.
What we need is common sense, we need honesty, we need greater investment in green technologies that are economically compelling and more than anything we need to overcome our general inertia. We must not drop this particular ball (unlike a certain English Goalkeeper).
Social Media to score big at the 2010 World Cup
Posted by Rack Packer - 11/06/10 at 11:06:02 amBusiness can look, tweet and learn from the impact that social media will have at this year’s World Cup
The World Cup is now upon us and excitement levels are reaching fever pitch across the globe. It is estimated that a billion people will tune in at some stage during the tournament to watch the likes of Messi, Kaka and Drogba light up the magnificent South African stadiums. Many pundits believe (hope?) that this will be the most exciting and memorable World Cup ever staged, and it’s not simply because of the quality of the players on the park. This World Cup is full of firsts.
The first time the tournament has been staged on the African Continent, that 3D broadcast technology has been used and that marketing and broadcasting revenues for a sporting event will top £2bn to give but three. And it will also be the first major sports event that will truly benefit from the digital age.
With the games airing live on cell phones and computers, the World Cup will get more online coverage than any major sporting event ever. Akamai Technologies Inc., estimated to deliver about 20 percent of the world’s Internet traffic, expects World Cup traffic to be two or three times as heavy as that measured during President Barack Obama’s inauguration — thus far, the high point for traffic volume at about 1 terabit, or 1 trillion bits of data, per second.
And this will be the first world cup where every kick, decision, goal and team selection will be debated globally using social media. (Even Sepp Blatter the 74 year old FIFA President has opened his own Twitter account in time for today’s opening ceremony.)
For those of us involved in the technology industry for the past decade, the rise of the phenomenon that is social media is not that surprising. It has long been predicted that the true power of the internet would be harnessed once its users evolved away from passive browsing to actively participating .
In fact you could argue that the template for social media is centuries old. We humans have been gossiping and sharing ideas since evolution. The difference today is that our technology enables us to communicate our messages around the globe, without face to face interaction, instantly.
Gradually social networking will impact on almost every role, in every kind of company. It is no longer a fad and is already changing the rules of the marketplace meaning that companies need to embrace it whether they feel comfortable with it or not.
Boardrooms across the land have often taken a ‘Marmite’ approach to social media – they either love it or hate it. However interacting online has now snowballed to such an extent that it can no longer be dismissed by businesses as a ‘not for me thank you.’
It is estimated that Facebook now has 400 million users and serves 6 million pages per day (a staggering 37.4 trillion per annum). The ‘net’ now houses 126 million blogs and 27.3 million tweets are sent and over 1 billion YouTube videos are viewed on a daily basis. If you thought this was limited to the young, bored or the geek, then think again. The professional networking site LinkedIn now has 65 million members and is growing at a rate of one new member every second.
The statistics are compelling. So, if you want your company to engage with this massive audience, what do you do and how can you make it work for you? The key piece of advice that I can impart is that whilst it might be termed social media and appear to be a completely different world, it is still business and the business rules that apply offline should apply online as well. Corporate risk of litigation, brand protection and legal liabilities still apply in hyperspace!
The first step that companies need to do is to create an holistic social media strategy. They need to decide and be clear on what their objectives are from day one, how they intend to resource and invest in their strategy and whether they are willing to open a two-way dialogue with the outside world. Too many companies have jumped in only to be left bemused by the apparent lack of success they have derived from the exercise. There is a widely held misconception that the domain of social media should be the preserve of the sales and marketing team and that engagement must involve lead generation – this is fundamentally wrong. Social media has the ability to improve processes at all levels and in all departments within an organisation if used properly.
“To listen well is as powerful a means of influence as to talk well and is as essential to all true conversation.”
Nowhere does this old Chinese proverb ring more true than in social media engagement. Don’t dive in, take your time, do your research, understand how other companies are using social media successfully and chose the applications that will serve you best and then determine the ‘tone’ that you wish to adopt. This ‘tone’ is important. It should reflect your organisation’s true personality and should avoid at all costs the ‘me, me, me’ syndrome. You need to talk to the market intelligently and without any marketing speak so people will want to respond. You will need to care about what is being said about your organisation and you will need to be prepared to receive feedback that is negative as well as positive. Above all you must stay consistent and you must persevere. Social media is a daily discipline.
If you use the medium properly you will be able to listen to current customers, new prospects, industry experts and opinion formers and perhaps just as importantly your own employees to ensure your business derives maximum benefit.
Once your strategy is in place, you need to communicate it internally. Draft a corporate social media policy that gives guidelines to employees on how they can best represent their organisation on line. Without making sure your entire staff is on board things can go bad very quickly as Vodafone discovered to its cost recently when an employee tweeted an obscene message via the company’s official Twitter account leading to public outrage. And returning to South Africa, the Netherlands players have been banned from using Twitter during the World Cup after Eljero Elia sparked a racism row with comments on a live streaming video.
Whilst these two examples made the headlines, there is no need for managers to recoil in horror as they imagine what these incidents would have meant for their own organisations. For every toe curling example of bad social media practice there are many thousands of positive stories.
Virgin (again!) received high praise for its ‘Did your driver do a good job today?’ message on the back of its Virgin Wine vans. Rather than the more usual corporate ‘Well driven?’ people were asked to contact the company and provide personal feedback on the driver because ‘There could be something in it for them’ – a perfect example of good business practise through customer engagement and employee reward.
A more jumbo-sized example of this involves hundreds of 5ft fibre glass elephants and London’s largest ever outdoor art festival - the London Elephant Parade. The UK domain names provider Easyspace decided to sponsor one of the elephants that are being displayed around the UK’s capital for the next few weeks. Rather than simply write a sponsorship cheque, Easyspace decided to use social media to maximise its involvement and extend the brand into areas not normally associated with web hosting. Local art students designed the elephant for us, an online campaign to raise awareness of the charitable reason for the Parade was launched, a Facebook page complete with video diary was posted and customers were invited to name the elephant – they chose ‘Cosmos’. All of which has helped change the perception of a brand which traditionally operates in the rather dry IT arena.
Finally the biggest question that is often asked of companies engaged in social media is, how do you measure its value? What is its ROI? The simple answer is that there is no simple answer. To get a community ROI requires work and effort. You have to track down data from a variety of sources some of which you will have no direct control or access to. Obvious data sources include web site analytics, sales lead sources and membership details but you also need to widen your search to include blogs, referrer pages, reviews, videos, fans, tweets and PR rankings, some of which can be measured using tools such as Howsociable?, Omgili and Tweetbeep. The key is recognising that processes must be in place internally to ensure that all data is captured and analysed.
Sometimes though you will just know when something has worked. I leave you with the story of Boeing and a young boy who loves airplanes.
Harry Winsor had sent Boeing a crayon drawing of a plane he had designed with a letter suggesting the company might consider manufacturing it. What he received back was a standard legal letter saying Boeing could not accept unsolicited ideas. Harry’s father, an ad agency executive, recounted all this on his blog and Twitter feed.
Boeing, who had only been using Twitter for two weeks, picked up the tweet and responded admitting “We’re expert at airplanes but novices in social media. We’re learning as we go.”
From being criticised for its original corporate response Boeing turned its mistake into a positive. It has spoken to Harry and promised better internal processes for handling submissions from children.
As Harry’s father said: “It was just so cool to see a company become kind of human.”
And that is what social media is all about.
Footnote: If you want to get close to the footy action , here’s a handy list of verified Twitter accounts of various World Cup players including Anelka, Iniesta, Donovan, Aguero and Forlan)
Plenty of spare storage capacity up in the Cloud
Posted by Rack Packer - 12/05/10 at 05:05:31 pm
Let cloud storage control your data before it controls you.
“Terabyte storage? That’s so last decade Darling. This year’s black is the zettabyte.”
For us luddites still mourning the loss of the 1.44MB (2.0MB unformatted) disk, the thought of the zettabyte is truly terrifying (although pretty handy for Scrabble).
The zettabyte is equal to 1 billion terabytes and according to IDC, in its latest global digital output report, the world’s generated data volume is expected to pass through the magic zettabyte figure for the first time later this year going on to exceed 35 zettabytes by 2020. (A zettabyte is estimated to be roughly half a million times the entire collections of all the academic libraries in the United States, or for Jack Bauer fans, a full-length episode of FOX TV’s hit series “24″ running continuously for 125 million years.)
As IT becomes ever more prevalent in every aspect of our lives, the amount of data generated and stored is growing at an astounding rate. It is estimated that 45GB of data currently exists for each person on the planet and that this will grow annually by a factor of 44 from 2009 to 2020, as all major forms of media complete their transformation from analog to digital.
Or to put it another way, it is estimated that the bytes of data generated by digital cameras, mobile phones, enterprise IT systems and devices will equal the number of grains of sand on the world’s beaches within the next year or two. And whilst 85 percent of this data is predicted to come from consumers snapping photos, surfing Web pages and sending e-mail, about 60 percent of that data will still enter and cross corporate networks. Simply put, 35% more digital information is created today than the capacity exists to store it.
Over the next few years, businesses will face tough decisions on how to store, find and access information whilst complying with regulations. Much of the data is unstructured, unmarked and resides in a variety of disparate locations, makes it almost impossible to retrieve and use.
This unprecedented growth in data volumes is having a significant effect on many businesses, with the most obvious impact being ongoing operational costs, performance and compliance.
And this is where the cloud may find its true calling. For a couple of years now, the industry has been touting the concept of cloud hosting as the ‘knight in white armour’ that promises to transform the way we operate in the future, whilst secretly praying it doesn’t pan out to be ‘a nerd in tin foil’.
Companies that are following the classic ‘strategy by bandwagon’ approach to business have not exactly been backward in slapping the word ‘cloud’ over any product that has an internet association - in the hope that they’ll mop up. This marketing approach has resulted in mixed messages and confusion, with cloud computing being hailed and jeered in equal measure. Deriving obvious benefits from cloud computing has not always been apparent to the market.
Data Storage represents a really viable utilisation of the cloud. It is very clear that the volume of data is going to keep growing and companies need to address this demand. IDC reports that the number of files, images, records and other digital information containers will grow by a factor of 67, each needing to be managed, secured and protected.
Organisations face a stark choice. Do they invest, and continue to invest, in hardware and software - King Canute style? Can they re-engineer their business processes to cope with the additional data demands without increasing labour costs? (Interestingly the IDC state that IT professionals globally will only grow by a factor or 1.4 despite the data deluge) Or will they simply turn a blindish eye and hope that the various Data Protection Agencies don’t catch up with them?
Cloud computing gives organisations the opportunity to buy ‘peace of mind’. Data storage is a headache and can prove to be a costly one at that. By utilising a cloud service provider’s infrastructure on a demand basis, organisations can rid themselves of the hardware investment and the aggravation. Despite rumours to the contrary, a private cloud model offers a secure data repository that is protected by cast iron service guarantees (and if your service provider can’t provide them – consider looking elsewhere), which can either be used as a standalone option or integrated within existing client infrastructure to form a hybrid solution.
And it’s not just the corporate world that will see cloud storage boon. 2010 ABI Research released this week shows that revenue related to US consumer use of cloud-based backup technology will grow from almost $75 million in 2009 to more than $372 million in 2015, (CAGR of 27.89 percent) - helped by the rise of netbooks and devices such as the iPad.
Cloud storage shouldn’t be that hard a concept to grasp, afterall Man naturally looks to the skies when seeking additional storage and archiving space at home - its called the Loft.
I’m off to get a calculator to work out next year’s craze – the lovvabyte.








Facebook
Twitter
Myspace
RSS Feed